VIDEO: Dallas' Steve Ott performs head-removal surgery on Panthers' Gregory Campbell
Impersonating his favorite air-to-ground missile, Ott goes in for the kill on Campbell, sparking a mind-bending but proper wig-out by Cats' defenseman Bryan McCabe.
Suspension? Not yet, and don't concern yourself with bias from the league office on this one.
Make the call...
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Definitely a charge … but “as bad as it gets” ??? I think Potvin is losing his mind.
CanesCountry.com: An Eye On Carolina Hockey
by Cory Lavalette on Mar 30, 2009 10:51 AM EDT reply actions
Indeed, he’s had more than a few emotional calls lately. Perhaps this playoff-chase thing is getting to him. Still love the guy, tho.
by Donny Rivette on Mar 30, 2009 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions
My initial opinion during the game was "HOLY HELL!!!"
It was an illegal hit and he deserved a major for it. I also thought we would be hearing about a suspension on this one.
After watching it a few times (with commentators muted), I think its just a really hard, sorta late hit. It was a combination of Campbell looking back right as he’s getting hit, his proximity from the boards and Ott taking a few strides too many on his way to the hit.
I don’t think it’s malicious and I also don’t think it was an obvious blow to the head. Arms and elbows werent up, it just a hard hit.
I applaude McCabe for his response as well. Nothing wrong with protecting a teammate. However, where was the instigator? Trevor Daley did the exact same thing a few weeks ago and got hit with it, why not here?
Also, any video of a supposed stick swing to Ott’s neck late in the game?
Defending Big D: A Dallas Stars blog on SBN: easy to use, free to join.
by Brandon Worley on Mar 30, 2009 11:57 AM EDT reply actions
A few things to consider on the hit
1. Ott did not leave his feet
2. Ott did not hit Campbell with his elbow. Any contact with Campbell’s head was courtesy of Ott’s shoulder.
3. The only reason Ott was hit with a major on that is because it looked worse in real time than it did on subsequent replays.
As for the reason McCabe didn’t get an instigator, the penalty that was handed out to him was a roughing minor.
Defending Big D an SBN Dallas Stars Blog | TheStarsFans
by Brandon Bibb on Mar 30, 2009 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Ah, well there ya go.
Defending Big D: A Dallas Stars blog on SBN: easy to use, free to join.
by Brandon Worley on Mar 30, 2009 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions
He was grabbed from behind, slung down to the ice, and by the time he got back to his skates, the linesmen were in between the two.
What the hell is he supposed to do in that situation?
Defending Big D an SBN Dallas Stars Blog | TheStarsFans
by Brandon Bibb on Mar 30, 2009 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions
intent to injure
the point is that Ott made no play on the puck. You cant just attack another ‘defenseless’ hockey player because you are pissed off. Guys can really get hurt, the the NHL needs to make sure these kind of things are avoided.
Im not biast, if a Panther made this kind of move, i’d be saying the same thing.
He should absolutly be suspended…safety needs to be a high priority, and in this case a message should be sent. I think 2-3 games would be sufficent…but I’m sure it wont be more then 1, if anything at all.
Peninsula Is Mightier:Your SB Nation Miami Heat Blog Community Juggernaut
The Litter Box: Your SBNation Florida Panthers Blogging Colossus
With the league being highly inconsistent with suspensions and tending towards none, I’d expect no suspension. On the other hand, they have been talking a great game about how head hits are bad, should be punished, etc – but its only talking, their actions aren’t backing their words mostly.
Should be a 3 game suspension in my opinion, since its fairly nasty.
I thought Ott’s elbow went straight for Campbell’s head on this one. Yes, Campbell had his head turned the wrong way and never saw it coming, which is party his fault. But Ott took off from the opposite dot and never stopped. It was bad.
Also, earlier in the month, Ott was suspended for gouging Travis Moen’s eye after a fight. Now this. The league usually goes after repeat offenders pretty hard, I’d be surprised if we don’t hear something by the end of the day.
That was an incidental gouge.
Even Moen said so. It happened after Moen started pummeling Ott, who couldn’t legally fight back.
Defending Big D: A Dallas Stars blog on SBN: easy to use, free to join.
by Brandon Worley on Mar 30, 2009 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions
Although honestly, I'm not sure how purely incidental an eye gouge can be.
Defending Big D: A Dallas Stars blog on SBN: easy to use, free to join.
by Brandon Worley on Mar 30, 2009 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions
Regardless of the intent on the eye gouge I don’t think the NHL can justify suspensions solely on past history. Chris Pronger keeps getting suspended because he keeps doing suspension worthy things, and that’s how it should be. The Ott hit looked bad but he kept his hands and stick down. Braydon Coburn doesn’t have suspension history but he directly extended his stick and hands to Antropov’s head. If the NHL wants to talk about punishing hits to the head they need to do that, instead of punishing the guys that lead the league in PIM and looking the other way for guys with cleaner reputations.
http://thehockeywriters.com/cheap-shot-or-crunching-hit-you-decide/
Shameless self-promotion, I admit, but I’m proud of it!

by
























