U.S. Olympic Team: Panthers need not apply
Ok. So Florida's Keith Ballard didn't make the cut.
We can live with it. We've survived - more or less in contention - without Michigan native and potential Olympian David Booth for the past two-plus months, so we can swallow the reality of a Team USA featuring zero Panthers.
Other than tragedies caught on video and emotional outbursts which quickly become the toast of YouTube, we Cats fans are acclimated to our heroes getting less-than-zippo screen time, even in our own back yard. Short of this, it'll remain that way until the Panthers grab a playoff spot.
But was the "slighting" of Ballard or even Jordan Leopold the correct path for USA GM Brian Burke to travel?
Florida backup goaltender Scott Clemmensen, an Iowa native, effectively played his way out of consideration long ago, for better or worse. Hey, even the vaunted Craig Anderson missed, so pipe down.
Word on the street - ok, Facebook - has many folks believing America's representation in the Vancouver Olympic Games will be of the softer, less competitive variety.
As always, Russia, Sweden, and of course Canada are the favorites going into the what may be the NHL's final appearance in the once-every-four-years NBC broadcast orgy (which only focuses on ice hockey during the last medal game anyway).
Was the omission of Baudette, Minnesota's Keith Ballard from Team USA a mistake? "Grand" is probably overstating things, and Burkie undoubedly knows how to construct a winning team, but will it hurt?
Jack Johnson, Erik Johnson, Mike Komisarek are Ryan Suter are that much better, that much more reliable? Bryan Rafalski gets a pass here, and Paul Martin is an old hand at the international game as well. Brooks Orpik just won a Cup, so there's his backstage entry. But aren't the others - whom we'll all raucously cheer for in mere weeks - at least ballpark to what Ballard or Golden Valley, Minnesota's Leopold might bring to the games, this season's stats aside?
Perhaps, but youth is the order of the day. Got to applaud Burke for building the American program with an eye toward the future, but jeez: Bally's 27, plays with insane heart, and does so on a - gulp - mediocre team.
Your take?
0 recs |
1 comment
|
Comments
Not shocked at all, but disappointed. If he wasn’t invited to the summer camp then there was something that USA saw that was a disqualifying factor. He hasn’t changed his game that much so far this season; certainly not enough for them to all of a sudden realize he’s a good player. There may be some history there or I may legitimately not be capable of seeing what they see hockey-wise. I don’t have too much of a problem with the rest of the list; a little surprised by both Johnsons but that’s my only complaint on D. I’d have taken Ballard or Gleason instead of one of either Johnson. Chris Drury? C’mon.
Great line about a perfect world and Mike Richards, but you are certainly not going to get any love for that point of view on such a heavily Canadian site. That guy is a hero up there. That hurts Team USA much more than losing Richards would hurt Canada. Then again, Booth would just be replacing another quality player while Drury continues to hold his birthright.
In an ideal world all ten fingers would be on my left hand so my right hand could just be a fist for punching.
by Fehr and Balanced on Jan 1, 2010 7:48 PM EST reply actions

by 























