Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Lakers Should Trade Andrew Bynum So He Doesn't Go To Waste

Per Bob McKenzie via Twitter.

over 1 year ago Dr_lbc_tiny Donny Rivette 8 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Big thanks to Karl S. for the heads-up.

Litter Box Cats - Your Panthers Colossus. Hit me up at Twitter and our Facebook FanPage

by Donny Rivette on Dec 31, 2010 3:22 PM EST reply actions  

Looks like Dadonov is staying up for sure then.

by Ryan Meier on Dec 31, 2010 3:56 PM EST reply actions  

Another case of a player not succeeding in an unfamiliar role. The Koistinens and Murphys of this teams past will be smirking right now.

Speaking of Murphy, did anyone else see his huge hit in the Spengler Cup yesterday?

by pukeoncops on Dec 31, 2010 4:09 PM EST reply actions  

Somebody got a better understanding of waiver rules than me? So, he’s waived, no one is going to claim him for that salary. So, the Panthers then buy him out and then he is free to sign with whomever he wishes, correct?

by badger737 on Jan 1, 2011 10:50 AM EST reply actions  

The Panthers would first try to trade him. Putting him on waivers gives them the chance to see if there’s any interest out there, and they can always pull him back. (I think)

If they make a trade then they can not only be rid of his contract, but also get something in return, such as a pick. Or a bag of pucks.
Kidding aside, I hear that Rhino is a class guy. This is a tough situation for any player to be in, especially at this time of year.

I personally don’t think they want to buy him out and have that remaining portion left on their salary cap.

by The Rat Trick on Jan 1, 2011 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

They can bury him in Rochester…gets the cap hit off the books, but he’s still paid the NHL salary. Pretty sure they’re not concerned about the cap hit anyway, only looking to clear the salary and position.

If he’s dealt while “on waivers” he’ll still have to come back through “re-entry waivers”, meaning the club that claims him – and half of his remaining salary – can lose him. Right?

Litter Box Cats - Your Panthers Colossus. Hit me up at Twitter and our Facebook FanPage

by Donny Rivette on Jan 1, 2011 4:14 PM EST up reply actions  

He can’t be traded until clearing waivers. Once he’s cleared, he can be loaned (to the AHL or a European league), traded or kept on the roster. If he’s kept on the roster, he can be on the roster for 30 days or play in 10 games before waivers expire and he’d have to clear again to be loaned. So, he could clear waivers, play 2 games and still get sent to the AHL without clearing waivers again.

Re-entry waivers are only necessary if a player is loaned. So, if a player clears waivers and is traded, then he can go right on the NHL roster of that team. If he clears waivers and is sent down, then he would have to go through re-entry waivers to rejoin the original club or if he’s traded while playing for the AHL (or a European club).

Waivers are often used to get trade offers. A team will put a player on waivers to see if there’s trade interest. The player will clear and teams will call with trade offers. If not, then they’re usually sent to the AHL or loaned to a European team. Or occasionally, there’s a claim.

Florida Panthers: Because at least you can go to the beach after yet another bad loss.
Litter Box Cats - Your Panthers Colossus.

by John Beatty on Jan 8, 2011 5:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for South Florida Hockey discussion and commentary

Follow LitterBoxCats on Twitter


Managing Editor/Founder

Dr_lbc_small Donny Rivette

Associate Editors

Newavatar_small John Beatty

Skrudland_small Ryan Meier

100_3256_small Chris S Roberts

Panther_small Kevin Kraczkowski

Contributors

Theo_small Alexander Calloway