New Head-Shot legislation proceeds to NHL Competition Committee
A lateral, back pressure or blindside hit to an opponent where the head is targeted and/or the principal point of contact is not permitted.
A violation of the above will result in a minor or major penalty and shall be reviewed for possible supplemental discipline.
- Proposal unanimously approved by league general managers Wednesday
In a nutshell, pending further committee approval (which will undoubtedly happen), no more "legal" shoulder-to-head hits. Next year. Probably.
It's progress, yes, but little consolation to fans of Florida's David Booth (the NHL's current poster child for high-hit reform) or Boston center Marc Savard, most recent involuntary member of the Stretcher Club with a dandy grade-two concussion.
Angelic Philadelphia prettyboy Mike Richards was not suspended on the October Booth shot, and word has come down that Pittsburgh's Matt Cooke - no stranger to on-ice nastiness - will escape the suspension guillotine as well, thanks primarily to the Richards precedent some months earlier.
What are they drinking behind Pennsylvania state lines, anyway? I jest, I jest.
For the record, here's the Savard hit - with commentary, and for those who still somehow haven't gorged on it enough, the Booth hit be here. Eerily similar.
Since this legislation is now "on the table" we Floridians can whine no longer over the Panthers' star winger - presumed to lead the club in goals this season - missing 45 games courtesy of the "legal" hit.
Anyway, this bill is a genuinely positive move forward. Now if they'd just eliminate the instigator rule this entire issue would vaporize...
As always, tons of reaction from around the league at SBN's Hockey Hub.
0 recs |
4 comments
|
Comments
The NHL disciplinary system
is a bad joke and new rules isn’t going to change it. Todd Bertuzzi is still in the game and players get a wrist slap for putting someone out of action for 3 months. 10 game suspension doesn’t equal 45 games without your best scorer.
Fans pay to see big goals, big saves and big hits.
The rule shows the league dissapproves of a certain reckless play, making a new rule doesn’t cost the league anything and it might even convince a few players to play a little less recklessly. But this rule is not the end of guys getting concussions.
There still going to have reckless, physical play because it’s good for business. Ultimately, the NHL discipinary system is about business too, not justice.
Not in the least. But doodz will think twice about taking a previously “legal” run at an opposing player.
by Donny Rivette on Mar 10, 2010 10:31 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
As I read it, this new rule is highly specific. “A… hit to an opponent where the head is…the principal point of contact is not permitted.”
If the head and another area are hit at the same time with the same force, there are two principal places of contact and that hit is outside the scope of the rule. Woulda been different had they said “… a principal place of contact…”
I’m glad they took the care to do that, since it isolates those really nasty hits while allowing the big hit to remain part of the NHL game.

by 
























