Comments / New

Panthers vs. Lightning Scoring Chances 10.16.2010

I’m about to write something I never thought I’d write when I started this project for the 2010-2011 Panthers:

For the fourth consecutive game the Panthers outplayed their opponents, and measurably so. For the fourth game in a row, Pete DeBoer made adjustments to the forward lines, bringing Steve Reinprecht in on the fourth line with Mike Santorelli and Steve Bernier and he moved Shawn Matthias up to the second line between David Booth and Rostislav Olesz and it worked.

Scoring Chances – Florida vs. Tampa, 10.16.2010

NHL Game Number 20059

Team Totals, Florida in Red

Period Totals EV PP 5v3 PP SH 5v3 SH
1 9 4 8 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 2 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
3 5 3 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 16 10 15 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

  • Domination in the first period – 9-4 at even strength.  Rather than go into a complete shell like they did in Calgary, they played an aggressive game and actually out-chanced the Lightning over the last two periods./

Scoring Chances by Period, Time and Game State

Team Period Time Note FLA Opponent
FLA 1 18:56 5 6 10 18 29 85 4 12 13 16 33 39 5v5
FLA 1 18:11 6 14 19 24 29 61 6 8 19 21 33 77 5v5
TBL 1 13:41 7 10 18 24 29 85 8 10 18 33 44 48 5v5
FLA 1 13:22 Goal 5 6 10 18 29 85 8 10 18 33 44 48 5v5
TBL 1 7:18 5 6 14 19 21 29 4 7 12 16 33 77 5v5
FLA 1 5:37 7 10 18 24 29 85 6 8 19 21 33 48 5v5
FLA 1 5:36 Goal 7 10 18 24 29 85 6 8 19 21 33 48 5v5
FLA 1 4:49 13 26 27 29 43 52 9 10 13 33 39 44 5v5
FLA 1 4:48 Goal 13 26 27 29 43 52 9 10 13 33 39 44 5v5
FLA 1 4:17 9 21 29 43 52 67 7 9 26 41 77 91 5v5
TBL 1 3:04 7 14 19 24 29 61 6 8 19 21 41 48 5v5
TBL 1 2:52 5 6 10 18 29 85 7 10 18 41 44 77 5v5
FLA 1 1:46 Goal 6 9 10 24 29 61 8 26 39 41 91 5v4
TBL 2 16:24 5 6 9 21 29 67 10 13 18 39 41 44 5v5
TBL 2 13:45 14 19 29 43 52 6 7 9 16 41 77 4v5
TBL 2 9:16 5 6 14 19 29 6 7 9 16 41 77 4v5
FLA 2 7:08 5 6 10 21 29 85 6 8 19 21 39 41 5v5
FLA 2 7:02 5 6 10 21 29 85 6 8 19 21 39 41 5v5
TBL 3 16:01 5 6 10 18 29 85 6 8 12 19 39 41 5v5
FLA 3 14:34 5 14 19 29 43 61 4 13 18 21 39 41 5v5
FLA 3 12:12 Goal 6 10 18 24 29 85 6 12 13 19 39 41 5v5
TBL 3 10:44 5 6 14 19 29 61 7 10 21 41 44 77 5v5
FLA 3 7:44 6 13 26 27 29 43 7 10 16 18 41 48 5v5
FLA 3 4:14 5 6 18 29 67 85 4 6 7 16 39 41 5v5
TBL 3 3:52 5 6 13 26 27 29 4 6 7 16 41 77 5v5
FLA 3 2:36 Goal 5 10 18 24 29 85 8 18 21 39 41 44 5v5

Scoring Chances by Player

# Player EV PP SH
5 B. ALLEN 19:09 7 6 0:20 0 0 1:56 0 1
6 D. WIDEMAN 18:22 8 6 5:01 1 0 1:56 0 1
7 D. KULIKOV 17:12 2 2 1:45 0 0 0:42 0 0
9 S. WEISS 12:13 1 1 5:17 1 0 0:28 0 0
10 D. BOOTH 10:40 8 3 4:52 1 0 0:38 0 0
13 M. SANTORELLI 10:47 3 1 1:05 0 0 1:29 0 0
14 R. DVORAK 14:36 2 3 0:11 0 0 2:02 0 2
18 S. MATTHIAS 13:05 7 3 0:09 0 0 0:00 0 0
19 M. REASONER 13:31 2 3 0:11 0 0 1:53 0 2
21 C. HIGGINS 14:43 3 2 1:41 0 0 1:01 0 0
24 B. MCCABE 15:18 5 2 4:48 1 0 0:00 0 0
26 S. BERNIER 11:48 3 1 0:00 0 0 0:00 0 0
27 S. REINPRECHT 11:41 3 1 0:50 0 0 0:00 0 0
29 T. VOKOUN 49:10 15 8 6:42 1 0 4:00 0 2
43 M. WEAVER 19:08 5 0 1:30 0 0 2:04 0 1
52 J. GARRISON 9:27 3 0 0:00 0 0 1:22 0 1
61 C. STILLMAN 11:26 2 2 5:03 1 0 0:00 0 0
67 M. FROLIK 11:55 2 1 0:09 0 0 0:00 0 0
85 R. OLESZ 11:37 9 3 0:38 0 0 0:29 0 0

  • Mike Weaver and Jason Garrison had an excellent game and the Booth – Matthias – Olesz line was the best line on the ice.
  • The fourth line was markedly better without Hordichuk or Mcardle on the ice.

Head-to-Head Even Strength Scoring Chances

*Click to enlarge

20059h2hchances_medium

  • The Shawn Matthias line did damage against every line except the Stamkos line
  • The third pairing, Garrison and Weaver played well against every line, though it was a bit of a concern that Garrison went down and did not return.